Review



anti pig cd46 antibody  (Bio-Rad)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bio-Rad is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 92

    Structured Review

    Bio-Rad anti pig cd46 antibody
    In PIECs, Claudin-2 did not affect the expression of <t>CD46,</t> CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I. (A) PIECs were infected with control lentivirus (ShNC) or with lentivirus expressing Claudin-2 specific siRNA(ShCLDN2-1, or ShCLDN2-2). After 4 days, total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (B, C) PIECs were treated as in A and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (B) . The quantitation data were presented by geometric mean fluorescence intensity (Gmean) (C) . (D) PIECs were infected with Adv-EV, or Adv-Claudin-2 for 72h, the total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (E, F) PIECs were treated as in D and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (E) . The quantitation data were presented by Gmean (F) . Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (mean ± SEM). N.S. means no significance.
    Anti Pig Cd46 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pig cd46 antibody/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 92 stars, based on 6 article reviews
    anti pig cd46 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    92/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Claudin-2 enhances human antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity of porcine endothelial cells by modulating antibody binding and complement activation"

    Article Title: Claudin-2 enhances human antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity of porcine endothelial cells by modulating antibody binding and complement activation

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1547512

    In PIECs, Claudin-2 did not affect the expression of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I. (A) PIECs were infected with control lentivirus (ShNC) or with lentivirus expressing Claudin-2 specific siRNA(ShCLDN2-1, or ShCLDN2-2). After 4 days, total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (B, C) PIECs were treated as in A and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (B) . The quantitation data were presented by geometric mean fluorescence intensity (Gmean) (C) . (D) PIECs were infected with Adv-EV, or Adv-Claudin-2 for 72h, the total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (E, F) PIECs were treated as in D and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (E) . The quantitation data were presented by Gmean (F) . Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (mean ± SEM). N.S. means no significance.
    Figure Legend Snippet: In PIECs, Claudin-2 did not affect the expression of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I. (A) PIECs were infected with control lentivirus (ShNC) or with lentivirus expressing Claudin-2 specific siRNA(ShCLDN2-1, or ShCLDN2-2). After 4 days, total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (B, C) PIECs were treated as in A and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (B) . The quantitation data were presented by geometric mean fluorescence intensity (Gmean) (C) . (D) PIECs were infected with Adv-EV, or Adv-Claudin-2 for 72h, the total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (E, F) PIECs were treated as in D and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (E) . The quantitation data were presented by Gmean (F) . Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (mean ± SEM). N.S. means no significance.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Infection, Control, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Flow Cytometry, Quantitation Assay, Fluorescence



    Similar Products

    92
    Bio-Rad anti pig cd46 antibody
    In PIECs, Claudin-2 did not affect the expression of <t>CD46,</t> CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I. (A) PIECs were infected with control lentivirus (ShNC) or with lentivirus expressing Claudin-2 specific siRNA(ShCLDN2-1, or ShCLDN2-2). After 4 days, total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (B, C) PIECs were treated as in A and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (B) . The quantitation data were presented by geometric mean fluorescence intensity (Gmean) (C) . (D) PIECs were infected with Adv-EV, or Adv-Claudin-2 for 72h, the total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (E, F) PIECs were treated as in D and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (E) . The quantitation data were presented by Gmean (F) . Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (mean ± SEM). N.S. means no significance.
    Anti Pig Cd46 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pig cd46 antibody/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti pig cd46 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Bio-Rad mabs against cd46 pig
    Characterization of porcine cell lines with regard to their <t>CD46</t> pig expression. (A) Phenotypical characterization of porcine cell lines by immunofluorescence staining using a CD46 pig -specific <t>mab</t> (green, <t>MCA2310GA)</t> and DAPI (blue). Asterisks (*) indicate cell lines subjected to conventional RT-PCR for subsequent sequencing. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of APPV P100 (porcine APPV-specific antiserum, red), CD46 pig (green, MCA2310GA), and DAPI (blue) at 72 h after infection of NPTr cells. (C) Strategy used for genetic characterization and manipulation of the CD46 pig gene locus. The CD46 pig -encoding mRNA was amplified by two RT-PCRs (101/710 and 604/1192) for subsequent cloning and sequencing. Absence of a CD46 pig -encoding mRNA in porcine lymphoma cell line 38A 1 D was confirmed by RT-PCRs targeting the individual CD46 pig domains (primer pairs: 192/353, 387/543, 571/710, 766/937). Positions of signal peptide (SP), complement control proteins 1 to 4 (ccp1-4), serine, threonine, proline-rich region (STP), and transmembrane domain (TM) encoded by the mRNA are depicted. In addition, positions of guide RNAs (gRNA CD46-2 and -7) used for construction of CD46 pig knockout cells are indicated (for details see ).
    Mabs Against Cd46 Pig, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mabs against cd46 pig/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mabs against cd46 pig - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Bio-Rad cd46
    Surface expression and de novo transcription of CEACAMs in Chang cells following cytokine stimulation and bacterial infection. Surface expression of CEACAMs on Chang cells was assessed by flow cytometry before and after cytokine stimulation using anti-CEACAM antibody AO115 that binds to multiple CEACAMs. Examples of histograms of CEACAM expression from one experiment are shown (A). CEACAM expression of unstimulated cells is shown in black (filled profile), that of stimulated cells in dotted white lines (traced on to black unfilled profile), and binding of the secondary antibody alone is shown in grey.B and C. Per cent change in the expression of CEACAM and <t>CD46</t> receptors in response to various cytokines as determined by flow cytometry. AO115 was used to detect CEACAMs (B) and J4-48 for CD46 detection (C) in Chang cells exposed to IFN-γ (diamonds), TNF-α (squares) and IL-1β (triangles) over a 72 h period. Per cent change of MFI observed over untreated cells is shown. Data are means and SEs from three determinations. Note: A and B are separate experiments.D. Agarose gel profile showing the results of a typical semiquantitative RT-PCR of mRNA extracted from Chang cells illustrating the relative levels of 18s rRNA and ceacam1 mRNA present in unstimulated and cytokine-stimulated cells. Lane contents are shown on the right. RT, reverse transcriptase.E. The relative changes in ceacam1 mRNA in cytokine-stimulated Chang cells (24 h) or in cells infected with bacteria (3 h) were calculated after normalizing for 18s rRNA. Means and SEs of 2–4 experiments are shown.F. Western blots showing CEACAM proteins expressed in Chang cells.Top: proteins extracted from unstimulated Chang cells [lane 2 (10 μg), lane 3 (20 μg) and lane 5 (40 μg)] or those exposed to IFN-γ[lane 4 (20 μg) and lane 6 (40 μg)] were analysed by Western blotting using anti-CEACAM antibodies. AO115 binds to multiple CEACAMs but recognized a protein only in stimulated cells, which corresponded to the migration of CEACAM1. Control samples of transfected HeLa cells expressing distinct CEACAMs were used for comparison (lane 1: HeLa-CEA and lane 7: HeLa-CEACAM1; 4 μg total protein of each).Bottom: lanes 1–3: polyclonal AO115 and anti-CEA/CEACAM3 cross-reacting monoclonal antibody COL-1 detection of CEACAMs in HeLa and Chang extracts. Lanes 1 and 4 contain 4 μg each of HeLa-CEA, -CEACAM1 and -CEACAM6. Lanes 2 and 5 contain 60 μg of total protein extract from unstimulated Chang cells, and lanes 3 and 6 contain 60 μg protein from stimulated Chang cells. Data show very low levels of CEACAM1 in unstimulated Chang cells, and only CEACAM1 is upregulated after IFN-γ treatment.
    Cd46, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd46/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd46 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    In PIECs, Claudin-2 did not affect the expression of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I. (A) PIECs were infected with control lentivirus (ShNC) or with lentivirus expressing Claudin-2 specific siRNA(ShCLDN2-1, or ShCLDN2-2). After 4 days, total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (B, C) PIECs were treated as in A and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (B) . The quantitation data were presented by geometric mean fluorescence intensity (Gmean) (C) . (D) PIECs were infected with Adv-EV, or Adv-Claudin-2 for 72h, the total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (E, F) PIECs were treated as in D and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (E) . The quantitation data were presented by Gmean (F) . Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (mean ± SEM). N.S. means no significance.

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: Claudin-2 enhances human antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity of porcine endothelial cells by modulating antibody binding and complement activation

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1547512

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In PIECs, Claudin-2 did not affect the expression of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I. (A) PIECs were infected with control lentivirus (ShNC) or with lentivirus expressing Claudin-2 specific siRNA(ShCLDN2-1, or ShCLDN2-2). After 4 days, total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (B, C) PIECs were treated as in A and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (B) . The quantitation data were presented by geometric mean fluorescence intensity (Gmean) (C) . (D) PIECs were infected with Adv-EV, or Adv-Claudin-2 for 72h, the total RNA was collected and the mRNA level of CD46, CD55, CD59, Factor H, or Factor I was analyzed by RT-PCR. (E, F) PIECs were treated as in D and analyzed with flow cytometry to assess the protein level of CD46 (E) . The quantitation data were presented by Gmean (F) . Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (mean ± SEM). N.S. means no significance.

    Article Snippet: Anti-pig CD46 antibody was from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Infection, Control, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Flow Cytometry, Quantitation Assay, Fluorescence

    Characterization of porcine cell lines with regard to their CD46 pig expression. (A) Phenotypical characterization of porcine cell lines by immunofluorescence staining using a CD46 pig -specific mab (green, MCA2310GA) and DAPI (blue). Asterisks (*) indicate cell lines subjected to conventional RT-PCR for subsequent sequencing. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of APPV P100 (porcine APPV-specific antiserum, red), CD46 pig (green, MCA2310GA), and DAPI (blue) at 72 h after infection of NPTr cells. (C) Strategy used for genetic characterization and manipulation of the CD46 pig gene locus. The CD46 pig -encoding mRNA was amplified by two RT-PCRs (101/710 and 604/1192) for subsequent cloning and sequencing. Absence of a CD46 pig -encoding mRNA in porcine lymphoma cell line 38A 1 D was confirmed by RT-PCRs targeting the individual CD46 pig domains (primer pairs: 192/353, 387/543, 571/710, 766/937). Positions of signal peptide (SP), complement control proteins 1 to 4 (ccp1-4), serine, threonine, proline-rich region (STP), and transmembrane domain (TM) encoded by the mRNA are depicted. In addition, positions of guide RNAs (gRNA CD46-2 and -7) used for construction of CD46 pig knockout cells are indicated (for details see ).

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: Porcine Complement Regulatory Protein CD46 Is a Major Receptor for Atypical Porcine Pestivirus but Not for Classical Swine Fever Virus

    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02186-20

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization of porcine cell lines with regard to their CD46 pig expression. (A) Phenotypical characterization of porcine cell lines by immunofluorescence staining using a CD46 pig -specific mab (green, MCA2310GA) and DAPI (blue). Asterisks (*) indicate cell lines subjected to conventional RT-PCR for subsequent sequencing. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of APPV P100 (porcine APPV-specific antiserum, red), CD46 pig (green, MCA2310GA), and DAPI (blue) at 72 h after infection of NPTr cells. (C) Strategy used for genetic characterization and manipulation of the CD46 pig gene locus. The CD46 pig -encoding mRNA was amplified by two RT-PCRs (101/710 and 604/1192) for subsequent cloning and sequencing. Absence of a CD46 pig -encoding mRNA in porcine lymphoma cell line 38A 1 D was confirmed by RT-PCRs targeting the individual CD46 pig domains (primer pairs: 192/353, 387/543, 571/710, 766/937). Positions of signal peptide (SP), complement control proteins 1 to 4 (ccp1-4), serine, threonine, proline-rich region (STP), and transmembrane domain (TM) encoded by the mRNA are depicted. In addition, positions of guide RNAs (gRNA CD46-2 and -7) used for construction of CD46 pig knockout cells are indicated (for details see ).

    Article Snippet: Staining was performed using commercially available mabs against CD46 pig (MCA2310GA and MCA2262GA, Bio-Rad, 1:500 dilution) and a secondary mab Alexa fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11029, Invitrogen, 1:1,000 dilution).

    Techniques: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequencing, Infection, Amplification, Cloning, Control, Knock-Out

    Characterization of genetically engineered CD46 pig knockout cells. (A) Phenotypical characterization of CD46 pig knockout cells by immunofluorescence staining using a mab against CD46 pig (green, MCA2310GA) and DAPI (blue). Immunofluorescence staining of CD46 pig (green) from wild-type (WT) cell lines served as a control and is shown in . (B) CRISPR/Cas9 induced genome alterations on both alleles characterized by sequencing of plasmids containing PCR amplicons flanking target sites of the guide RNAs (primers 101fw/710rev). Consensus nucleotide sequences and deduced amino acid sequences of the regions encoding the C terminus of SP and the N terminus of ccp1 are shown. For comparison, nucleotide and deduced CD46 pig amino acid sequences of WT as determined for SPEV and PK15 cells are given in the top row. The border between SP/ccp1 and position of gRNAs including respective protospacer adjacent motifs (PAM, boxed) are indicated. For selected engineered CD46 pig knockout cell lines (ΔCD46) the corresponding sequences including deletions (Δ nt) and insertions (+ nt) are shown below the WT CD46 sequence.

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: Porcine Complement Regulatory Protein CD46 Is a Major Receptor for Atypical Porcine Pestivirus but Not for Classical Swine Fever Virus

    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02186-20

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization of genetically engineered CD46 pig knockout cells. (A) Phenotypical characterization of CD46 pig knockout cells by immunofluorescence staining using a mab against CD46 pig (green, MCA2310GA) and DAPI (blue). Immunofluorescence staining of CD46 pig (green) from wild-type (WT) cell lines served as a control and is shown in . (B) CRISPR/Cas9 induced genome alterations on both alleles characterized by sequencing of plasmids containing PCR amplicons flanking target sites of the guide RNAs (primers 101fw/710rev). Consensus nucleotide sequences and deduced amino acid sequences of the regions encoding the C terminus of SP and the N terminus of ccp1 are shown. For comparison, nucleotide and deduced CD46 pig amino acid sequences of WT as determined for SPEV and PK15 cells are given in the top row. The border between SP/ccp1 and position of gRNAs including respective protospacer adjacent motifs (PAM, boxed) are indicated. For selected engineered CD46 pig knockout cell lines (ΔCD46) the corresponding sequences including deletions (Δ nt) and insertions (+ nt) are shown below the WT CD46 sequence.

    Article Snippet: Staining was performed using commercially available mabs against CD46 pig (MCA2310GA and MCA2262GA, Bio-Rad, 1:500 dilution) and a secondary mab Alexa fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11029, Invitrogen, 1:1,000 dilution).

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Control, CRISPR, Sequencing, Comparison

    Primers used in this study

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: Porcine Complement Regulatory Protein CD46 Is a Major Receptor for Atypical Porcine Pestivirus but Not for Classical Swine Fever Virus

    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02186-20

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Primers used in this study

    Article Snippet: Staining was performed using commercially available mabs against CD46 pig (MCA2310GA and MCA2262GA, Bio-Rad, 1:500 dilution) and a secondary mab Alexa fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11029, Invitrogen, 1:1,000 dilution).

    Techniques: Sequencing, Plasmid Preparation

    Relevance of CD46 pig for the entry of porcine pestiviruses. Wild-type (WT) SPEV and PK15 as well as CD46 pig knockout cell lines (SPEVΔCD46 clones 2 and 7 and PK15ΔCD46 clone 2) were infected with APPV P17 , APPV P100 , BuPV, and CSFV strains Alfort-Tübingen (AlfT), Diepholz, Riems, Koslov, and Paderborn at an MOI of 1, respectively. Immunofluorescence staining was performed at 72 h p.i. using porcine APPV-specific antiserum, a porcine BuPV-specific antiserum, and a mab against CSFV, respectively. A strong reduction of APPV infection is evident on all SPEVΔCD46 cell lines in comparison to that on SPEV cells. PK15 cells display significantly lower permissivity to APPV P100 compared to that of SPEV cells. Non-culture-adapted APPV P17 obtained from early passage revealed the same CD46 pig dependency as the culture-adapted variant (APPV P100 ). With regard to infections with CSFV and BuPV, there are no differences in permissivity between the WT and the CD46 pig knockout cell lines.

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: Porcine Complement Regulatory Protein CD46 Is a Major Receptor for Atypical Porcine Pestivirus but Not for Classical Swine Fever Virus

    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02186-20

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Relevance of CD46 pig for the entry of porcine pestiviruses. Wild-type (WT) SPEV and PK15 as well as CD46 pig knockout cell lines (SPEVΔCD46 clones 2 and 7 and PK15ΔCD46 clone 2) were infected with APPV P17 , APPV P100 , BuPV, and CSFV strains Alfort-Tübingen (AlfT), Diepholz, Riems, Koslov, and Paderborn at an MOI of 1, respectively. Immunofluorescence staining was performed at 72 h p.i. using porcine APPV-specific antiserum, a porcine BuPV-specific antiserum, and a mab against CSFV, respectively. A strong reduction of APPV infection is evident on all SPEVΔCD46 cell lines in comparison to that on SPEV cells. PK15 cells display significantly lower permissivity to APPV P100 compared to that of SPEV cells. Non-culture-adapted APPV P17 obtained from early passage revealed the same CD46 pig dependency as the culture-adapted variant (APPV P100 ). With regard to infections with CSFV and BuPV, there are no differences in permissivity between the WT and the CD46 pig knockout cell lines.

    Article Snippet: Staining was performed using commercially available mabs against CD46 pig (MCA2310GA and MCA2262GA, Bio-Rad, 1:500 dilution) and a secondary mab Alexa fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11029, Invitrogen, 1:1,000 dilution).

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Clone Assay, Infection, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Comparison, Variant Assay

    Production of infectious particles and RNA replication of porcine pestiviruses in dependence on CD46 pig . Wild-type (WT) SPEV and PK15, as well as CD46 pig knockout cell lines (SPEVΔCD46 clones 2 and 7 and PK15ΔCD46 clone 2), were infected with APPV P100 , CSFV Alfort-Tübingen (AlfT), and BuPV at an MOI of 1, respectively. (A) Supernatants were harvested 72 h p.i. to determine virus titers by using endpoint dilution assays in quadruplicates and in three repetitions. (B) Cells were collected at 72 h p.i. for RNA preparation and subsequent RT-PCR analysis. TaqMan based qRT-PCR assays were used for detection of CSFV and APPV genomes, whereas a SYBR green-based real-time RT-PCR was performed for detection of BuPV genomes. 30 ng total RNA was used per reaction. Samples collected from three individual experiments were tested in duplicates. Mean values with standard deviations are shown. APPV genome copy numbers obtained from WT cells are significantly higher compared to those from CD46 pig knockout cells (***, P < 0.0001, highly significant; *, P < 0.01, significant). CSFV and BuPV genome levels obtained from WT cells did not show significant differences compared to genome loads detected in infected knockout cells.

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: Porcine Complement Regulatory Protein CD46 Is a Major Receptor for Atypical Porcine Pestivirus but Not for Classical Swine Fever Virus

    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02186-20

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Production of infectious particles and RNA replication of porcine pestiviruses in dependence on CD46 pig . Wild-type (WT) SPEV and PK15, as well as CD46 pig knockout cell lines (SPEVΔCD46 clones 2 and 7 and PK15ΔCD46 clone 2), were infected with APPV P100 , CSFV Alfort-Tübingen (AlfT), and BuPV at an MOI of 1, respectively. (A) Supernatants were harvested 72 h p.i. to determine virus titers by using endpoint dilution assays in quadruplicates and in three repetitions. (B) Cells were collected at 72 h p.i. for RNA preparation and subsequent RT-PCR analysis. TaqMan based qRT-PCR assays were used for detection of CSFV and APPV genomes, whereas a SYBR green-based real-time RT-PCR was performed for detection of BuPV genomes. 30 ng total RNA was used per reaction. Samples collected from three individual experiments were tested in duplicates. Mean values with standard deviations are shown. APPV genome copy numbers obtained from WT cells are significantly higher compared to those from CD46 pig knockout cells (***, P < 0.0001, highly significant; *, P < 0.01, significant). CSFV and BuPV genome levels obtained from WT cells did not show significant differences compared to genome loads detected in infected knockout cells.

    Article Snippet: Staining was performed using commercially available mabs against CD46 pig (MCA2310GA and MCA2262GA, Bio-Rad, 1:500 dilution) and a secondary mab Alexa fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11029, Invitrogen, 1:1,000 dilution).

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Clone Assay, Infection, Virus, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitative RT-PCR, SYBR Green Assay

    Impact of CD46 pig at early time points of porcine pestivirus infections. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of CSFV- and BuPV-infected cells. Wild-type (WT) PK15 and PK15ΔCD46 clone 2 cells were infected with CSFV strains Alfort-Tübingen (AlfT), Diepholz, Riems, Koslov, Paderborn, and BuPV at an MOI of 1. Infections with different CSFV strains and BuPV showed no dependency on CD46 pig even very early after infection (16 h p.i.). (B) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of APPV-infected cells. WT SPEV and PK15 as well as CD46 pig knockout cell lines (SPEVΔCD46 clone 2 and PK15ΔCD46 clone 2) were infected with cell culture-adapted APPV P100 at an MOI of 0.5. Scale bars indicate 100 µm for lower magnification and 50 µm for higher magnification. A strong reduction of APPV P100 infection is evident on both CD46 pig knockout cell lines in comparison to that on WT cells at early time point of infection (16 h p.i.). APPV P100 genomes were observed only on single CD46 pig knockout cells within the infected wells. APPV P100 infection of CD46 pig -expressing WT SPEV cells at a later time point (72 h p.i.) and noninfected SPEV cells (NIC) served as controls.

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: Porcine Complement Regulatory Protein CD46 Is a Major Receptor for Atypical Porcine Pestivirus but Not for Classical Swine Fever Virus

    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02186-20

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Impact of CD46 pig at early time points of porcine pestivirus infections. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of CSFV- and BuPV-infected cells. Wild-type (WT) PK15 and PK15ΔCD46 clone 2 cells were infected with CSFV strains Alfort-Tübingen (AlfT), Diepholz, Riems, Koslov, Paderborn, and BuPV at an MOI of 1. Infections with different CSFV strains and BuPV showed no dependency on CD46 pig even very early after infection (16 h p.i.). (B) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of APPV-infected cells. WT SPEV and PK15 as well as CD46 pig knockout cell lines (SPEVΔCD46 clone 2 and PK15ΔCD46 clone 2) were infected with cell culture-adapted APPV P100 at an MOI of 0.5. Scale bars indicate 100 µm for lower magnification and 50 µm for higher magnification. A strong reduction of APPV P100 infection is evident on both CD46 pig knockout cell lines in comparison to that on WT cells at early time point of infection (16 h p.i.). APPV P100 genomes were observed only on single CD46 pig knockout cells within the infected wells. APPV P100 infection of CD46 pig -expressing WT SPEV cells at a later time point (72 h p.i.) and noninfected SPEV cells (NIC) served as controls.

    Article Snippet: Staining was performed using commercially available mabs against CD46 pig (MCA2310GA and MCA2262GA, Bio-Rad, 1:500 dilution) and a secondary mab Alexa fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11029, Invitrogen, 1:1,000 dilution).

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Infection, Fluorescence, In Situ Hybridization, Knock-Out, Cell Culture, Comparison, Expressing

    Comparison of E2 envelope protein sequences of pestiviruses. (A) Phylogenetic tree (maximum likelihood) based on E2 amino acid sequences of known pestivirus species (APPV: AUL76967 ; bat: AFK85014 , AYV99177 ; rodent: ATP66856 , ATP66857 , YP009109567; pangolin: QIE06437 ; LindaV: YP009407716; whale: MK910228 ; BuPV: YP008992092; BDV: AAC16444 ; Aydin: YP006860588; ovine Italy: MG770617 ; giraffe: NP620053; pronghorn: YP009026415; BVDV-1: Q01499 ; BVDV-2: YP009513240; BVDV-3: AB871953 ; CSFV: YP009508222). APPV and CSFV sequence (bold) are the same as shown in the alignment. (B) Alignment (ClustalW) of APPV (isolate L277) and CSFV (Alfort 187) E2 amino acid sequences. Highlighted is the CSFV sequence analogous to the motif in the E2 of BVDV folding into a hairpin that might serve as ligand to the CD46 bov receptor . The positions of two nonsynonymous mutations (N751K and D752N) which occurred during cell culture adaptation of APPV are highlighted by a box.

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: Porcine Complement Regulatory Protein CD46 Is a Major Receptor for Atypical Porcine Pestivirus but Not for Classical Swine Fever Virus

    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02186-20

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of E2 envelope protein sequences of pestiviruses. (A) Phylogenetic tree (maximum likelihood) based on E2 amino acid sequences of known pestivirus species (APPV: AUL76967 ; bat: AFK85014 , AYV99177 ; rodent: ATP66856 , ATP66857 , YP009109567; pangolin: QIE06437 ; LindaV: YP009407716; whale: MK910228 ; BuPV: YP008992092; BDV: AAC16444 ; Aydin: YP006860588; ovine Italy: MG770617 ; giraffe: NP620053; pronghorn: YP009026415; BVDV-1: Q01499 ; BVDV-2: YP009513240; BVDV-3: AB871953 ; CSFV: YP009508222). APPV and CSFV sequence (bold) are the same as shown in the alignment. (B) Alignment (ClustalW) of APPV (isolate L277) and CSFV (Alfort 187) E2 amino acid sequences. Highlighted is the CSFV sequence analogous to the motif in the E2 of BVDV folding into a hairpin that might serve as ligand to the CD46 bov receptor . The positions of two nonsynonymous mutations (N751K and D752N) which occurred during cell culture adaptation of APPV are highlighted by a box.

    Article Snippet: Staining was performed using commercially available mabs against CD46 pig (MCA2310GA and MCA2262GA, Bio-Rad, 1:500 dilution) and a secondary mab Alexa fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11029, Invitrogen, 1:1,000 dilution).

    Techniques: Comparison, Sequencing, Cell Culture

    Surface expression and de novo transcription of CEACAMs in Chang cells following cytokine stimulation and bacterial infection. Surface expression of CEACAMs on Chang cells was assessed by flow cytometry before and after cytokine stimulation using anti-CEACAM antibody AO115 that binds to multiple CEACAMs. Examples of histograms of CEACAM expression from one experiment are shown (A). CEACAM expression of unstimulated cells is shown in black (filled profile), that of stimulated cells in dotted white lines (traced on to black unfilled profile), and binding of the secondary antibody alone is shown in grey.B and C. Per cent change in the expression of CEACAM and CD46 receptors in response to various cytokines as determined by flow cytometry. AO115 was used to detect CEACAMs (B) and J4-48 for CD46 detection (C) in Chang cells exposed to IFN-γ (diamonds), TNF-α (squares) and IL-1β (triangles) over a 72 h period. Per cent change of MFI observed over untreated cells is shown. Data are means and SEs from three determinations. Note: A and B are separate experiments.D. Agarose gel profile showing the results of a typical semiquantitative RT-PCR of mRNA extracted from Chang cells illustrating the relative levels of 18s rRNA and ceacam1 mRNA present in unstimulated and cytokine-stimulated cells. Lane contents are shown on the right. RT, reverse transcriptase.E. The relative changes in ceacam1 mRNA in cytokine-stimulated Chang cells (24 h) or in cells infected with bacteria (3 h) were calculated after normalizing for 18s rRNA. Means and SEs of 2–4 experiments are shown.F. Western blots showing CEACAM proteins expressed in Chang cells.Top: proteins extracted from unstimulated Chang cells [lane 2 (10 μg), lane 3 (20 μg) and lane 5 (40 μg)] or those exposed to IFN-γ[lane 4 (20 μg) and lane 6 (40 μg)] were analysed by Western blotting using anti-CEACAM antibodies. AO115 binds to multiple CEACAMs but recognized a protein only in stimulated cells, which corresponded to the migration of CEACAM1. Control samples of transfected HeLa cells expressing distinct CEACAMs were used for comparison (lane 1: HeLa-CEA and lane 7: HeLa-CEACAM1; 4 μg total protein of each).Bottom: lanes 1–3: polyclonal AO115 and anti-CEA/CEACAM3 cross-reacting monoclonal antibody COL-1 detection of CEACAMs in HeLa and Chang extracts. Lanes 1 and 4 contain 4 μg each of HeLa-CEA, -CEACAM1 and -CEACAM6. Lanes 2 and 5 contain 60 μg of total protein extract from unstimulated Chang cells, and lanes 3 and 6 contain 60 μg protein from stimulated Chang cells. Data show very low levels of CEACAM1 in unstimulated Chang cells, and only CEACAM1 is upregulated after IFN-γ treatment.

    Journal: Cellular Microbiology

    Article Title: IFN-γ amplifies NFκB-dependent Neisseria meningitidis invasion of epithelial cells via specific upregulation of CEA-related cell adhesion molecule 1

    doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01038.x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Surface expression and de novo transcription of CEACAMs in Chang cells following cytokine stimulation and bacterial infection. Surface expression of CEACAMs on Chang cells was assessed by flow cytometry before and after cytokine stimulation using anti-CEACAM antibody AO115 that binds to multiple CEACAMs. Examples of histograms of CEACAM expression from one experiment are shown (A). CEACAM expression of unstimulated cells is shown in black (filled profile), that of stimulated cells in dotted white lines (traced on to black unfilled profile), and binding of the secondary antibody alone is shown in grey.B and C. Per cent change in the expression of CEACAM and CD46 receptors in response to various cytokines as determined by flow cytometry. AO115 was used to detect CEACAMs (B) and J4-48 for CD46 detection (C) in Chang cells exposed to IFN-γ (diamonds), TNF-α (squares) and IL-1β (triangles) over a 72 h period. Per cent change of MFI observed over untreated cells is shown. Data are means and SEs from three determinations. Note: A and B are separate experiments.D. Agarose gel profile showing the results of a typical semiquantitative RT-PCR of mRNA extracted from Chang cells illustrating the relative levels of 18s rRNA and ceacam1 mRNA present in unstimulated and cytokine-stimulated cells. Lane contents are shown on the right. RT, reverse transcriptase.E. The relative changes in ceacam1 mRNA in cytokine-stimulated Chang cells (24 h) or in cells infected with bacteria (3 h) were calculated after normalizing for 18s rRNA. Means and SEs of 2–4 experiments are shown.F. Western blots showing CEACAM proteins expressed in Chang cells.Top: proteins extracted from unstimulated Chang cells [lane 2 (10 μg), lane 3 (20 μg) and lane 5 (40 μg)] or those exposed to IFN-γ[lane 4 (20 μg) and lane 6 (40 μg)] were analysed by Western blotting using anti-CEACAM antibodies. AO115 binds to multiple CEACAMs but recognized a protein only in stimulated cells, which corresponded to the migration of CEACAM1. Control samples of transfected HeLa cells expressing distinct CEACAMs were used for comparison (lane 1: HeLa-CEA and lane 7: HeLa-CEACAM1; 4 μg total protein of each).Bottom: lanes 1–3: polyclonal AO115 and anti-CEA/CEACAM3 cross-reacting monoclonal antibody COL-1 detection of CEACAMs in HeLa and Chang extracts. Lanes 1 and 4 contain 4 μg each of HeLa-CEA, -CEACAM1 and -CEACAM6. Lanes 2 and 5 contain 60 μg of total protein extract from unstimulated Chang cells, and lanes 3 and 6 contain 60 μg protein from stimulated Chang cells. Data show very low levels of CEACAM1 in unstimulated Chang cells, and only CEACAM1 is upregulated after IFN-γ treatment.

    Article Snippet: The mouse monoclonal antibody J4-48 reacts with CD46 (Serotec).

    Techniques: Expressing, Infection, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay, Agarose Gel Electrophoresis, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reverse Transcription, Bacteria, Western Blot, Migration, Control, Transfection, Comparison

     CD46  expression in human respiratory cell lines and in Chang conjunctiva cells in response to cytokines.

    Journal: Cellular Microbiology

    Article Title: IFN-γ amplifies NFκB-dependent Neisseria meningitidis invasion of epithelial cells via specific upregulation of CEA-related cell adhesion molecule 1

    doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01038.x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CD46 expression in human respiratory cell lines and in Chang conjunctiva cells in response to cytokines.

    Article Snippet: The mouse monoclonal antibody J4-48 reacts with CD46 (Serotec).

    Techniques: Expressing